
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

GeForce GTX 650
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌83.5% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 16.1 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 650
2012Why buy it
- ✅0.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 86.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

GeForce GTX 650
The GeForce GTX 650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,756 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the GeForce GTX 650 reaches 1,756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 650 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 650). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726 | 1,756+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8333 TFLOPS+3% | 0.8125 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 650 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 650 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 650).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 650's 65W — a 26.1% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-23% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.5+28% | 27.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition came in at $200, while the GeForce GTX 650 launched at $109. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 was 45.5% cheaper ($91 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 16.1 (GeForce GTX 650) — the GeForce GTX 650 offers 87.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $109-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6 | 16.1+87% |
| Codename | GK107 | GK107 |
| Release | November 8 2013 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #925 | #719 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















