
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 650

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is positioned at rank #388 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition.
| Insight | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 103.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and GeForce GTX 650

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

GeForce GTX 650
The GeForce GTX 650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,756 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the GeForce GTX 650 reaches 1,756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 650 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 650). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726 | 1,756+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8333 TFLOPS+3% | 0.8125 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 650 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 650 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 650).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 650's 65W — a 26.1% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-23% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.5+28% | 27.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 650 launched at $109 and now averages $25. The GeForce GTX 650 costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.5 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 70.2 (GeForce GTX 650) — the GeForce GTX 650 offers 103.5% better value. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $109-46% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $25-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.5 | 70.2+103% |
| Codename | GK107 | GK107 |
| Release | November 8 2013 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #925 | #719 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















