
Firepro W5170M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 670M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Firepro W5170M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 670M
2012Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Firepro W5170M
2014GeForce GTX 670M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Firepro W5170M better than GeForce GTX 670M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 670M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Firepro W5170M | GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Firepro W5170M | GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Firepro W5170M | GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Firepro W5170M | GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Firepro W5170M and GeForce GTX 670M
Firepro W5170M
Firepro W5170M
The Firepro W5170M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,774 points.

GeForce GTX 670M
GeForce GTX 670M
The GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 598 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,714 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro W5170M scores 1,774 and the GeForce GTX 670M reaches 1,714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W5170M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 670M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Firepro W5170M) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 670M). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Firepro W5170M) vs 0.8037 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670M).
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,774+4% | 1,714 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+90% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS+47% | 0.8037 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 448 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 670M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Firepro W5170M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro W5170M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 670M has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 670M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Firepro W5170M) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670M) — the GeForce GTX 670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Firepro W5170M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro W5170M) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 670M). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W5170M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 670M).
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | No NVENC (Fermi) |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro W5170M draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 670M's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Firepro W5170M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W5170M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 670M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 59.1+158% | 22.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















