Firepro W5170M vs GeForce GTX 670M

Firepro W5170M

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670M

2012Core: 598 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Firepro W5170M

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GeForce GTX 670M

2012

Why buy it

  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

So, is Firepro W5170M better than GeForce GTX 670M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,774 vs 1,714 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Firepro W5170M is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (30W vs 75W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Firepro W5170M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2014 generation instead of 2012 and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Firepro W5170M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Firepro W5170M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Firepro W5170M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 3.5% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (30W vs 75W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is GeForce GTX 670M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce GTX 670M is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Firepro W5170M is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirepro W5170MGeForce GTX 670M
1080p
low28 FPS17 FPS
medium17 FPS10 FPS
high10 FPS6 FPS
ultra5 FPS4 FPS
1440p
low13 FPS8 FPS
medium7 FPS4 FPS
high3 FPS2 FPS
ultra2 FPS1 FPS
4K
low5 FPS4 FPS
medium3 FPS2 FPS
high1 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirepro W5170MGeForce GTX 670M
1080p
low54 FPS44 FPS
medium29 FPS25 FPS
high20 FPS19 FPS
ultra14 FPS13 FPS
1440p
low25 FPS22 FPS
medium14 FPS13 FPS
high8 FPS8 FPS
ultra7 FPS7 FPS
4K
low7 FPS8 FPS
medium4 FPS5 FPS
high3 FPS4 FPS
ultra2 FPS3 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirepro W5170MGeForce GTX 670M
1080p
low80 FPS77 FPS
medium64 FPS62 FPS
high53 FPS51 FPS
ultra40 FPS39 FPS
1440p
low60 FPS58 FPS
medium48 FPS46 FPS
high40 FPS39 FPS
ultra30 FPS29 FPS
4K
low40 FPS39 FPS
medium32 FPS31 FPS
high27 FPS26 FPS
ultra20 FPS19 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirepro W5170MGeForce GTX 670M
1080p
low80 FPS67 FPS
medium64 FPS54 FPS
high53 FPS38 FPS
ultra40 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low60 FPS9 FPS
medium48 FPS7 FPS
high40 FPS6 FPS
ultra30 FPS5 FPS
4K
low40 FPS6 FPS
medium30 FPS4 FPS
high25 FPS4 FPS
ultra17 FPS3 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Firepro W5170M and GeForce GTX 670M

Firepro W5170M

The Firepro W5170M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,774 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670M

The GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 598 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,714 points.

Graphics Performance

The Firepro W5170M scores 1,774 and the GeForce GTX 670M reaches 1,714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W5170M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 670M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Firepro W5170M) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 670M). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Firepro W5170M) vs 0.8037 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670M).

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GTX 670M
G3D Mark Score
1,774+4%
1,714
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640+90%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.184 TFLOPS+47%
0.8037 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
24+50%
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
160 KB
448 KB+180%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 670M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Firepro W5170M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GTX 670M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Firepro W5170M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 670M has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 670M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Firepro W5170M) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670M) — the GeForce GTX 670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GTX 670M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
3 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Firepro W5170M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GTX 670M
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro W5170M) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 670M). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W5170M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 670M).

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GTX 670M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
No NVENC (Fermi)
Decoder
UVD
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro W5170M draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 670M's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Firepro W5170M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W5170M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 670M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GTX 670M
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
59.1+158%
22.9