GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Quadro K2200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

2012Core: 720 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K2200

2014Core: 1046 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Quadro K2200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Quadro K2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Quadro K2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

2012

Why buy it

  • 25.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 680M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 25.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K2200 instead at 3,580 vs 3,569, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 680M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K2200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K2200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 680M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Quadro K2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI scores 3,569 and the Quadro K2200 reaches 3,580 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro K2200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX 680M SLI) vs 640 (Quadro K2200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M SLIQuadro K2200
G3D Mark Score
3,569
3,580
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2688+320%
640

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M SLIQuadro K2200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200 carries 4 GB. Quadro K2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M SLIQuadro K2200
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M SLIQuadro K2200
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 680M SLI) vs NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro K2200). Decoder: VP5 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 680M SLI) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M SLIQuadro K2200
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
NVENC 4th Gen
Decoder
VP5
NVDEC 1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI draws 75W versus the Quadro K2200's 68W — a 9.8% difference. The Quadro K2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K2200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M SLIQuadro K2200
TDP
75W
68W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
203mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
47.6
52.6+11%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K2200 (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M SLIQuadro K2200
MSRP
$500
Codename
N13E-GTX
GM107
Release
June 4 2012
July 22 2014
Ranking
#385
#534

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.