GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Quadro K2200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is positioned at rank 141 and the Quadro K2200M is on rank 27, so the Quadro K2200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M SLI

#39

Radeon RX 7700S

MSRP: $449|Avg: $350

97%

#131

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

304%

#133

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

276%

#134

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

275%

#138

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

250%

#139

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

248%

#141

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#145

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

MSRP: $229|Avg: $65

98%

#147

GeForce GT 630M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35

97%

#150

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2200M

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

79%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

75%

#12

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

334%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

70%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

69%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

69%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

69%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

68%

#27

Quadro K2200M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

90%

#33

Radeon PRO W6400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $200

83%

#36

T600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $180

73%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2200M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 680M SLI	Quadro K2200M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 680M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI Benchmark Check

Quadro K2200M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680M SLI and Quadro K2200M

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

Quadro K2200M

The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI scores 3,569 and the Quadro K2200M reaches 3,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro K2200M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX 680M SLI) vs 640 (Quadro K2200M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M SLI	Quadro K2200M
G3D Mark Score	3,569	3,535
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2688+320%	640

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M SLI	Quadro K2200M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200M has 4 GB. The Quadro K2200M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M SLI	Quadro K2200M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI draws 75W versus the Quadro K2200M's 65W — a 14.3% difference. The Quadro K2200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K2200M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.