GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

2012

Why buy it

✅34.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅GeForce GTX 680M SLI is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 680M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 34.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (3,569 vs 3,500), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 680M SLI is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 550 (móvel) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 680M SLI still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1287 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $79.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI scores 3,569 and the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX 680M SLI) vs 640 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M SLI	Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	3,569+2%	3,500
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2688+320%	640

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 680M SLI does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 680M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M SLI	Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M SLI and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 550 (móvel).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M SLI	Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 550 (móvel)'s 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M SLI	Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	47.6	70.0+47%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (móvel) (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M SLI	Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP	—	$79
Codename	N13E-GTX	Lexa
Release	June 4 2012	July 2 2017
Ranking	#385	#614

Search GeForce GTX 680M SLI on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 550 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.