
GeForce GTX 680M
Popular choices:

Quadro M1200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 680M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.
Quadro M1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 680M
2012Quadro M1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 680M better than Quadro M1200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro M1200 make more sense than GeForce GTX 680M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680M and Quadro M1200

GeForce GTX 680M
GeForce GTX 680M
The GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 719 MHz to 758 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,277 points. Launch price was $310.50.

Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680M scores 3,277 and the Quadro M1200 reaches 3,212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M is built on Kepler while the Quadro M1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 640 (Quadro M1200). Raw compute: 2.038 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200). Boost clocks: 758 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,277+2% | 3,212 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+110% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.038 TFLOPS+46% | 1.399 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 758 MHz | 1150 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 320 KB+186% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 680M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M1200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,VP8 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680M draws 100W versus the Quadro M1200's 45W — a 75.9% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 350W (Quadro M1200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 81°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 45W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 81°C-1% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.8 | 71.4+118% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M1200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK104 | GM107 |
| Release | June 4 2012 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #561 | #567 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













