GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M

2012Core: 719 MHzBoost: 758 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

2017Core: 1093 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 680M

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Quadro M1200

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 680M better than Quadro M1200?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,277 vs 3,212 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 680M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 680M is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 680M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. GeForce GTX 680M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 680M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.0% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M1200 is the newer 2017 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (45W vs 100W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Quadro M1200 make more sense than GeForce GTX 680M?
Yes. Quadro M1200 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 100W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 680M. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 680M currently gives you 2.0% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
1080p
low78 FPS34 FPS
medium67 FPS21 FPS
high53 FPS13 FPS
ultra35 FPS6 FPS
1440p
low68 FPS16 FPS
medium60 FPS9 FPS
high42 FPS4 FPS
ultra27 FPS2 FPS
4K
low25 FPS5 FPS
medium23 FPS3 FPS
high15 FPS2 FPS
ultra13 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
1080p
low79 FPS79 FPS
medium56 FPS49 FPS
high43 FPS37 FPS
ultra27 FPS22 FPS
1440p
low44 FPS36 FPS
medium29 FPS27 FPS
high21 FPS17 FPS
ultra15 FPS12 FPS
4K
low17 FPS12 FPS
medium11 FPS9 FPS
high9 FPS8 FPS
ultra6 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
1080p
low147 FPS145 FPS
medium118 FPS116 FPS
high98 FPS96 FPS
ultra74 FPS72 FPS
1440p
low111 FPS108 FPS
medium88 FPS87 FPS
high74 FPS72 FPS
ultra55 FPS54 FPS
4K
low74 FPS72 FPS
medium59 FPS58 FPS
high49 FPS48 FPS
ultra37 FPS36 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
1080p
low131 FPS145 FPS
medium103 FPS116 FPS
high88 FPS96 FPS
ultra71 FPS72 FPS
1440p
low99 FPS108 FPS
medium79 FPS87 FPS
high68 FPS72 FPS
ultra51 FPS54 FPS
4K
low58 FPS71 FPS
medium44 FPS56 FPS
high35 FPS46 FPS
ultra24 FPS35 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680M and Quadro M1200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M

The GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 719 MHz to 758 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,277 points. Launch price was $310.50.

NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M scores 3,277 and the Quadro M1200 reaches 3,212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M is built on Kepler while the Quadro M1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 640 (Quadro M1200). Raw compute: 2.038 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200). Boost clocks: 758 MHz vs 1150 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
G3D Mark Score
3,277+2%
3,212
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344+110%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.038 TFLOPS+46%
1.399 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
758 MHz
1150 MHz+52%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+180%
40
L1 Cache
112 KB
320 KB+186%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M1200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC,VP8
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M draws 100W versus the Quadro M1200's 45W — a 75.9% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 350W (Quadro M1200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 81°C vs 82°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
TDP
100W
45W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
81°C-1%
82°C
Perf/Watt
32.8
71.4+118%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M1200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MQuadro M1200
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK104
GM107
Release
June 4 2012
January 11 2017
Ranking
#561
#567