GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon 660M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M

2012Core: 719 MHzBoost: 758 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 660M

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon 660M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon 660M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680M

2012

Why buy it

  • 32.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.

Radeon 660M

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 680M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (3,277 vs 3,221), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 680M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 660M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon 660M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M

The GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 719 MHz to 758 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,277 points. Launch price was $310.50.

AMD

Radeon 660M

The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M scores 3,277 and the Radeon 660M reaches 3,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 384 (Radeon 660M). Raw compute: 2.038 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M). Boost clocks: 758 MHz vs 1900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MRadeon 660M
G3D Mark Score
3,277+2%
3,221
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1344+250%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.038 TFLOPS+40%
1.459 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
758 MHz
1900 MHz+151%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+367%
24
L1 Cache
112 KB
128 KB+14%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 660M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MRadeon 660M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 660M carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 680M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M and System on the Radeon 660M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 660M) — the Radeon 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MRadeon 660M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M draws 100W versus the Radeon 660M's 40W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 350W (Radeon 660M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MRadeon 660M
TDP
100W
40W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
81°C
Perf/Watt
32.8
80.5+145%