GeForce GTX 680M
VS
Radeon R9 M290X

GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R9 M290X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M

2012Core: 719 MHzBoost: 758 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M290X

2014Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 680M is positioned at rank 105 and the Radeon R9 M290X is on rank 399, so the GeForce GTX 680M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M

#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#95
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
265%
#97
240%
#98
240%
#102
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
218%
#103
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
216%
#105
GeForce GTX 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
100%
#106
Radeon HD 7470M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12
100%
#110
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
98%
#114
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
MSRP: $179|Avg: $40
95%
#116
GeForce GTX 880M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
93%
#117
GeForce MX570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $120
93%
#118
Radeon RX 6500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
93%
#119
GeForce 825M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X

#388
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1349%
#390
1223%
#391
1219%
#395
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1109%
#396
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1101%
#399
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
100%
#400
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
100%
#401
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#402
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
97%
#403
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#405
97%
#406
Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
93%
#407
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
93%
#408
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
#409
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
91%
#410
90%
#411
Intel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
89%
#412
Radeon R7 A365
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
89%
#413
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 680M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M290X.

InsightGeForce GTX 680MRadeon R9 M290X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 680M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 680M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $60), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 22.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 680MRadeon R9 M290X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+22.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R9 M290X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M

The GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 719 MHz to 758 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,277 points. Launch price was $310.50.

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X

The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M scores 3,277 and the Radeon R9 M290X reaches 3,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 2.038 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X). Boost clocks: 758 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MRadeon R9 M290X
G3D Mark Score
3,277+2%
3,218
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344+5%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.038 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock
758 MHz
900 MHz+19%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+40%
80
L1 Cache
112 KB
320 KB+186%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MRadeon R9 M290X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MRadeon R9 M290X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MRadeon R9 M290X
TDP
100W
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
81°C
Perf/Watt
32.8+2%
32.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 680M costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.5 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 53.6 (Radeon R9 M290X) — the GeForce GTX 680M offers 22.2% better value. The Radeon R9 M290X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MRadeon R9 M290X
MSRP
$400
Avg Price (30d)
$50-17%
$60
Performance per Dollar
65.5+22%
53.6
Codename
GK104
Neptune
Release
June 4 2012
January 9 2014
Ranking
#561
#566