GeForce GTX 680M
Radeon R9 M470X
GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R9 M470X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R9 M470X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R9 M470X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 680M
2012Why buy it
- ✅34.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M470X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R9 M470X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 680M
The GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 719 MHz to 758 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,277 points. Launch price was $310.50.
Radeon R9 M470X
The Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,244 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680M scores 3,277 and the Radeon R9 M470X reaches 3,244 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M470X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M470X). Raw compute: 2.038 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470X). Boost clocks: 758 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,277+1% | 3,244 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+50% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.038 TFLOPS+3% | 1.971 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 758 MHz | 1100 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+100% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 224 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 680M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M470X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M470X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M470X) — the GeForce GTX 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680M draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M470X's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M470X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 81°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.8 | 43.3+32% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R9 M470X (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $350 |
| Codename | GK104 | Emerald |
| Release | June 4 2012 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #561 | #563 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R9 M470X
