GeForce GTX 780M
VS
GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce RTX 4060

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780M

2013Core: 823 MHzBoost: 797 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 780M is positioned at rank #212 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 780M

#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
88%
#202
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
424%
#204
384%
#205
383%
#209
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
348%
#210
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
346%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
100%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
95%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
95%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
92%
#222
91%
#224
GeForce GT 640M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
111%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
107%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
105%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
105%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
105%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
104%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
103%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
103%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
102%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
101%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
100%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
100%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
98%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
98%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
98%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
97%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
96%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
95%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
94%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
94%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
92%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
92%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
92%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
91%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
91%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
91%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 408.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780M.

InsightGeForce GTX 780MGeForce RTX 4060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-408.4%)
Leading raw performance (+408.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $60), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 780M.

InsightGeForce GTX 780MGeForce RTX 4060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($60)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780M and GeForce RTX 4060

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780M

The GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,845 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 780M scores 3,845 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 408.4%. The GeForce GTX 780M is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 2460 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MGeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score
3,845
19,548+408%
Architecture
Kepler
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1536
3072+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.448 TFLOPS
15.11 TFLOPS+517%
Boost Clock
797 MHz
2460 MHz+209%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
128+33%
96
L1 Cache
0.13 MB
3 MB+2208%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
24 MB+4700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 780M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MGeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 70% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MGeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
272 GB/s+70%
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
24 MB+4700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MGeForce RTX 4060
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 780M) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 780M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MGeForce RTX 4060
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
NVENC 8th gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780M draws 122W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 5.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 73°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MGeForce RTX 4060
TDP
122W
115W-6%
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
8-pin
Length
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
73°C-9%
Perf/Watt
31.5
170.0+440%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 780M costs 79.9% less ($239 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MGeForce RTX 4060
MSRP
$299
Avg Price (30d)
$60-80%
$299
Performance per Dollar
64.1
65.4+2%
Codename
GK104
AD107
Release
May 11 2013
May 18 2023
Ranking
#511
#84