GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 850A is positioned at rank #473 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 850A

#463

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2125%

#465

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1926%

#466

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1921%

#470

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1747%

#471

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1735%

#473

GeForce GTX 850A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

100%

#474

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#475

Mobility Radeon HD 5730

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

99%

#476

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

MSRP: $152|Avg: $118

99%

#477

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

99%

#479

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

MSRP: $699|Avg: $150

98%

#480

Radeon HD 8510G + 8500M Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

97%

#481

Radeon R5 M330

MSRP: $120|Avg: $20

97%

#482

Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#483

GeForce GTX 760A

MSRP: $249|Avg: $40

96%

#484

Radeon R9 M270X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

94%

#485

Mobility Radeon HD 5470

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

94%

#486

Radeon R7 M260

MSRP: $110|Avg: $110

94%

#487

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Serisi

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

94%

#488

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 850A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 925.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 850A.

Insight	GeForce GTX 850A	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-925.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+925.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 584% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 850A.

Insight	GeForce GTX 850A	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+584%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 850A Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 850A and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GTX 850A

The GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 767 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 850A scores 767 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 925.9%. The GeForce GTX 850A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 850A) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 850A) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850A	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	767	7,869+926%
Architecture	Maxwell	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	640	896+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+107%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1665 MHz+48%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	56+40%
L1 Cache	320 KB	896 KB+180%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 850A	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 850A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 850A) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 850A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850A	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 850A draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 850A) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850A	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	10.2	104.9+928%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 850A launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 850A costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (GeForce GTX 850A) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 585.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).