GeForce GTX 850M vs GRID K240Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 850M vs GRID K240Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 850M vs GRID K240Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 850M

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 225W, a 180W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌400% higher power demand at 225W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K240Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (2,541 vs 2,537), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 850M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K240Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID K240Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 850M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 850M vs GRID K240Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 850M

The GeForce GTX 850M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 936 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,537 points.

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 850M scores 2,537 and the GRID K240Q reaches 2,541 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 850M is built on Maxwell while the GRID K240Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 1,536 (GRID K240Q). Raw compute: 1.155 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 850M	GRID K240Q
G3D Mark Score	2,537	2,541
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1536+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.155 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS+98%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	128+220%
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 850M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K240Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850M	GRID K240Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 850M and 64-bit on the GRID K240Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce GTX 850M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850M	GRID K240Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 11_0 (GRID K240Q). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850M	GRID K240Q
DirectX	11.0	11_0
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	1	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 850M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 850M	GRID K240Q
Encoder	NVENC 2.0	—
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	—
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 850M draws 45W versus the GRID K240Q's 225W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 350W (GRID K240Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850M	GRID K240Q
TDP	45W-80%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	56.4+399%	11.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 850M (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 850M	GRID K240Q
MSRP	—	$500
Codename	GM107	GK104
Release	March 12 2014	June 28 2013
Ranking	#629	#628

Search GeForce GTX 850M on Amazon

Search GRID K240Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.