GeForce GTX 850M
VS
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce GTX 850M vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 850M

2014Core: Up to 936 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 850M is positioned at rank #68 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 850M

#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
97%
#58
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
214%
#60
194%
#61
193%
#65
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
176%
#66
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
175%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#78
Radeon HD 8970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170
95%
#82
Arc 7-Core iGPU
MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
110%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
108%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
108%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
107%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
106%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
106%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
104%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
104%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
103%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
101%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
101%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
101%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
100%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
100%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
100%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
100%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
99%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
99%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
99%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
98%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
96%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
94%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
93%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
93%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
93%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
92%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
91%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
91%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
90%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 850M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 792.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 850M.

InsightGeForce GTX 850MGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-792.8%)
Leading raw performance (+792.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 850M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $380 for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, it costs 89% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 6.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 850MGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+6.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 850M and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 850M

The GeForce GTX 850M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 936 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,537 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 850M scores 2,537 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 792.8%. The GeForce GTX 850M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.155 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

FeatureGeForce GTX 850MGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
2,537
22,651+793%
Architecture
Maxwell
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
640
4352+580%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.155 TFLOPS
22.06 TFLOPS+1810%
ROPs
16
48+200%
TMUs
40
136+240%
L1 Cache
0.31 MB
4.3 MB+1287%
L2 Cache
2 MB
32 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 850M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureGeForce GTX 850MGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 850M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 850MGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
8 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
288 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
32 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 850MGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX
11.0
12.2+11%
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 850M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

FeatureGeForce GTX 850MGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder
NVENC 2.0
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 850M draws 45W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 112.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 850MGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP
45W-72%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
0mm
240mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
56.4
141.6+151%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 850M costs 89.5% less ($340 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.4 (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 850M offers 6.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 850MGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$40-89%
$380
Performance per Dollar
63.4+6%
59.6
Codename
GM107
AD106
Release
March 12 2014
May 18 2023
Ranking
#629
#59