GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is positioned at rank #202 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 880M SLI

#192

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

398%

#194

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

361%

#195

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

360%

#199

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

327%

#200

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

325%

#202

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#203

GeForce GT 730M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

99%

#206

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#208

Radeon RX Vega M GL

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

94%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

89%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 880M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 92.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 880M SLI.

Insight	GeForce GTX 880M SLI	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-92.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+92.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 880M SLI and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 206W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,091 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 880M SLI scores 4,091 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 92.3%. The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M SLI	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	4,091	7,869+92%
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3072+243%	896

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M SLI	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 25% advantage for the GeForce GTX 880M SLI. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M SLI	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	160 GB/s+25%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI draws 206W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 93.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M SLI	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	206W	75W-64%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	19.9	104.9+427%