GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Quadro M2200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

2014Core: 954 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

2017Core: 695 MHzBoost: 1036 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Quadro M2200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Quadro M2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Quadro M2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M2200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 274.5% higher power demand at 206W vs 55W.

Quadro M2200

2017

Why buy it

  • 19.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 55W instead of 206W, a 151W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M2200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5% in PassMark G3D (4,294 vs 4,091), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 880M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M2200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M2200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 880M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Quadro M2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 206W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,091 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 880M SLI scores 4,091 versus the Quadro M2200's 4,294 — the Quadro M2200 leads by 5%. The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro M2200 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 1,024 (Quadro M2200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 880M SLIQuadro M2200
G3D Mark Score
4,091
4,294+5%
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3072+200%
1024

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880M SLIQuadro M2200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2200 carries 4 GB. Quadro M2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 880M SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro M2200.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880M SLIQuadro M2200
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI draws 206W versus the Quadro M2200's 55W — a 115.7% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro M2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880M SLIQuadro M2200
TDP
206W
55W-73%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
19.9
78.1+292%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 880M SLIQuadro M2200
MSRP
$500
Codename
N15E-GX-A2
GM206
Release
March 12 2014
January 11 2017
Ranking
#310
#479

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.