GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 28.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌87.3% higher power demand at 206W vs 110W.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 110W instead of 206W, a 96W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (4,260 vs 4,091), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 880M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 880M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 206W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,091 points.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI scores 4,091 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M SLI	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score	4,091	4,260+4%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072+140%	1280

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M SLI	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — a 12% advantage for the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 880M SLI and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370.

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M SLI	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	160 GB/s	179.2 GB/s+12%
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI draws 206W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 60.8% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M SLI	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP	206W	110W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	220mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	19.9	38.7+94%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M SLI	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP	—	$149
Codename	N15E-GX-A2	Trinidad
Release	March 12 2014	May 5 2015
Ranking	#310	#456

Search GeForce GTX 880M SLI on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.