GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Radeon RX 460

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

2014Core: 954 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 460

2016Core: 1090 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Radeon RX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
  • 174.7% higher power demand at 206W vs 75W.

Radeon RX 460

2016

Why buy it

  • 7.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 206W, a 131W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (4,099 vs 4,091), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 880M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 880M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 206W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,091 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 460

The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI scores 4,091 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460).

FeatureGeForce GTX 880M SLIRadeon RX 460
G3D Mark Score
4,091
4,099
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
3072+243%
896

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880M SLIRadeon RX 460
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 460 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 460) — a 42.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 880M SLI. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 880M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880M SLIRadeon RX 460
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s+43%
112 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI draws 206W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 93.2% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880M SLIRadeon RX 460
TDP
206W
75W-64%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
170mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
19.9
54.7+175%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 460 (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 880M SLIRadeon RX 460
MSRP
$110
Codename
N15E-GX-A2
Baffin
Release
March 12 2014
August 8 2016
Ranking
#310
#485

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.