
GeForce GTX 960A

Quadro 7000
GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro 7000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro 7000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro 7000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 960A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $14,300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 7102.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 204W, a 129W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 7000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro 7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅70.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌7185.9% HIGHER MSRP$14,499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($14,499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌172% higher power demand at 204W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro 7000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 960A
The GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,465 points.

Quadro 7000
The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960A scores 3,465 and the Quadro 7000 reaches 3,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960A is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 7000 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 512 (Quadro 7000). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,465 | 3,505+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.389 TFLOPS+4% | 1.3322 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 896 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 7000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960A has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 7000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 7000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960A and 64-bit on the Quadro 7000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 0.75 MB (Quadro 7000) — the GeForce GTX 960A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960A draws 75W versus the Quadro 7000's 204W — a 92.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 960A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 350W (Quadro 7000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 46.2+169% | 17.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 960A came in at $199, while the Quadro 7000 launched at $14499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 960A was 98.6% cheaper ($14300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.4 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 0.2 (Quadro 7000) — the GeForce GTX 960A offers 8600% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 960A (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-99% | $14499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.4+8600% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GM107 | GF110 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | May 2 2012 |
| Ranking | #546 | #541 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















