GeForce GTX 960A vs GRID K520

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 960A vs GRID K520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 960A vs GRID K520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 960A

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,400 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1682.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID K520

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1708.5% HIGHER MSRP
$3,599 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (3,516 vs 3,465), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 960A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 960A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,400 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $3,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1682.3% (17.4 vs 1.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID K520 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 960A vs GRID K520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 960A

The GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,465 points.

GRID K520

The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 960A scores 3,465 and the GRID K520 reaches 3,516 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960A is built on Maxwell while the GRID K520 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 1,536 (GRID K520). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K520).

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	GRID K520
G3D Mark Score	3,465	3,516+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1536 ×2+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS ×2+65%
ROPs	16	32 ×2+100%
TMUs	40	128 ×2+220%
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 960A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K520 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	GRID K520
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960A and 64-bit on the GRID K520. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K520) — the GeForce GTX 960A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	GRID K520
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID K520). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	GRID K520
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Max Displays	0	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 960A) vs NVENC 1 (GRID K520). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	GRID K520
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC 1
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	NVDEC 1
Codecs	—	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 960A draws 75W versus the GRID K520's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 960A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 350W (GRID K520). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	GRID K520
TDP	75W-67%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	46.2+196%	15.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 960A came in at $199, while the GRID K520 launched at $3599. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 960A was 94.5% cheaper ($3400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.4 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 1.0 (GRID K520) — the GeForce GTX 960A offers 1640% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 960A (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	GRID K520
MSRP	$199-94%	$3599
Performance per Dollar	17.4+1640%	1.0
Codename	GM107	GK104
Release	March 13 2015	July 23 2013
Ranking	#546	#540

Search GeForce GTX 960A on Amazon

Search GRID K520 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.