GeForce GTX 960A vs Tesla C2050 / C2070

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 960A vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 960A vs Tesla C2050 / C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 960A

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1169.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 238W, a 163W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 248mm, a 247mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1155.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌217.3% higher power demand at 238W vs 75W.
❌24700% longer card at 248mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 960A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (3,465 vs 3,428), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 960A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 960A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,300 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1169.3% (17.4 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 960A vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 960A

The GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,465 points.

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 960A scores 3,465 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960A is built on Maxwell while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Tesla C2050 / C2070
G3D Mark Score	3,465+1%	3,428
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640+43%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS+35%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	40	56+40%
L1 Cache	320 KB	896 KB+180%
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 960A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Tesla C2050 / C2070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 960A has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2050 / C2070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960A and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050 / C2070. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the GeForce GTX 960A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Tesla C2050 / C2070
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	6 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Tesla C2050 / C2070
DirectX	12+9%	11_0
Max Displays	0	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 960A draws 75W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 104.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 960A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 248mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Tesla C2050 / C2070
TDP	75W-68%	238W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	248mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	46.2+221%	14.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 960A came in at $199, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 960A was 92% cheaper ($2300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.4 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 1.4 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the GeForce GTX 960A offers 1142.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 960A (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP	$199-92%	$2499
Performance per Dollar	17.4+1143%	1.4
Codename	GM107	GF100
Release	March 13 2015	July 25 2011
Ranking	#546	#569

Search GeForce GTX 960A on Amazon

Search Tesla C2050 / C2070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.