GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon E8870PCIe

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon E8870PCIe FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon E8870PCIe: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 960A

2015

Why buy it

✅75.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.

Radeon E8870PCIe

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 960A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
25.6% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 960A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 75.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (3,465 vs 3,368), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 960A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 960A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 29.2% (17.4 vs 13.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon E8870PCIe Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 960A

The GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,465 points.

Radeon E8870PCIe

The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 960A scores 3,465 and the Radeon E8870PCIe reaches 3,368 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon E8870PCIe uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 625 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Radeon E8870PCIe
G3D Mark Score	3,465+3%	3,368
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS+74%	0.8 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1085 MHz+74%	625 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	320 KB+100%	160 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 960A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E8870PCIe leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Radeon E8870PCIe
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960A and 64-bit on the Radeon E8870PCIe. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the GeForce GTX 960A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Radeon E8870PCIe
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 960A draws 75W versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 37W — a 67.9% difference. The Radeon E8870PCIe is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Radeon E8870PCIe
TDP	75W	37W-51%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	46.2	91.0+97%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 960A came in at $199, while the Radeon E8870PCIe launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 960A was 20.4% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.4 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 13.5 (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the GeForce GTX 960A offers 28.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 960A (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 960A	Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP	$199-20%	$250
Performance per Dollar	17.4+29%	13.5
Codename	GM107	Venus
Release	March 13 2015	January 25 2014
Ranking	#546	#734

Search GeForce GTX 960A on Amazon

Search Radeon E8870PCIe on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.