
GeForce GTX 970M SLI vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

GeForce GTX 970M SLI
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is positioned at rank #132 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 970M SLI
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 970M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970M SLI and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

GeForce GTX 970M SLI
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 162W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI scores 5,500 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM reaches 5,474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,474 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+90% | 1344 |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz+6% | 980 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 120 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — a 526% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970M SLI. Bus width: 192-bit x2 vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 120 GB/s x2 | 192 GB/s+60% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit x2 | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP6) | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI draws 162W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM's 170W — a 4.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 162W-5% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0+6% | 32.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















