
GeForce GTX 970M SLI

Radeon R9 285 / 380
GeForce GTX 970M SLI vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 970M SLI vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 970M SLI vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 162W instead of 190W, a 28W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 285 / 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 285 / 380
2014Why buy it
- ✅49.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌17.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 162W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 970M SLI vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 970M SLI
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 162W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI scores 5,500 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,550 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 970M SLI gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 120 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — a 583% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970M SLI. Memory bus width is 192-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 970M SLI and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 120 GB/s x2 | 176 GB/s+47% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit x2 | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP6) | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI draws 162W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 15.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 162W-15% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 221mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0+16% | 29.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














