
Arc A310

GeForce GTX 970M SLI
Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 970M SLI Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 970M SLI FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 970M SLI: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A310
2022Why buy it
- ✅25.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 162W, a 87W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 54.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌116% higher power demand at 162W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 970M SLI Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

GeForce GTX 970M SLI
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 162W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the GeForce GTX 970M SLI reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 970M SLI uses Maxwell, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 5,500+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+93% | 1038 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 120 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) — a 869.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970M SLI. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 192-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 970M SLI.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s+3% | 120 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit x2+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs NVENC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | PureVideo HD (VP6) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 970M SLI's 162W — a 73.4% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 169mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-54% | 162W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 169mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5+113% | 34.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc A310 (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Codename | DG2-128 | — |
| Release | October 12 2022 | October 7 2014 |
| Ranking | #422 | #284 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















