Arc A310 vs Tesla K80

Intel

Arc A310

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K80

2014Core: 562 MHzBoost: 824 MHz

Arc A310 vs Tesla K80 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A310 vs Tesla K80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A310

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,900 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 4969.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Tesla K80

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 4900% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,000 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 54.4 G3D/$ ($5,000 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A310 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (5,438 vs 5,363), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,900 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $5,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4969.9% (54.4 vs 1.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc A310 vs Tesla K80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A310

The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla K80

The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 824 MHz.

FeatureArc A310Tesla K80
G3D Mark Score
5,438+1%
5,363
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Kepler 2.0
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
2496 ×2+225%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.072 TFLOPS
4.113 TFLOPS ×2+34%
Boost Clock
2000 MHz+143%
824 MHz
ROPs
16
48 ×2+200%
TMUs
32
208 ×2+550%
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+450%
0.2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+167%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A310Tesla K80
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 128-bit on the Tesla K80. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A310Tesla K80
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+167%
1.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 120% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureArc A310Tesla K80
TDP
75W-75%
300W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
169mm
Height
69mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
72.5+305%
17.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A310 came in at $100, while the Tesla K80 launched at $5000. On MSRP, Arc A310 was 98% cheaper ($4900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 1.1 (Tesla K80) — the Arc A310 offers 4845.5% better value. The newer card here is Arc A310 (2022 vs 2014).

FeatureArc A310Tesla K80
MSRP
$100-98%
$5000
Performance per Dollar
54.4+4845%
1.1
Codename
DG2-128
GK210
Release
October 12 2022
November 17 2014
Ranking
#422
#419

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.