Arc A310 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel)

Intel

Arc A310

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1291 MHz

Arc A310 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A310 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A310 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A310

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $400 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 407.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

  • 21.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 400% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 54.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Arc A310 instead at 5,438 vs 5,353, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 16nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 407.9% (54.4 vs 10.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P2000 (móvel) still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A310 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A310

The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1291 MHz.

FeatureArc A310Quadro P2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
5,438+2%
5,353
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Pascal
Process Node
6 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
768
1152+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.072 TFLOPS+3%
2.974 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2000 MHz+55%
1291 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
72+125%
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+162%
0.42 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+220%
1.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A310Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A310Quadro P2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+220%
1.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureArc A310Quadro P2000 (móvel)
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
169mm
Height
69mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
72.5+2%
71.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A310 came in at $100, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500. On MSRP, Arc A310 was 80% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 10.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Arc A310 offers 408.4% better value. The newer card here is Arc A310 (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureArc A310Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP
$100-80%
$500
Performance per Dollar
54.4+408%
10.7
Codename
DG2-128
GP106
Release
October 12 2022
February 15 2019
Ranking
#422
#399

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.