Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Arc A310
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A310
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A310 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Arc A310 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A310.
| Insight | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A310 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM reaches 5,474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 5,474 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1344+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS+17% | 2.634 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+104% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 112+250% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+900% | 0.11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — a 54.8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 192 GB/s+55% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM's 170W — a 77.6% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 169mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-56% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 169mm | 241mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5+125% | 32.2 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A310 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GK104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | September 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #422 | #417 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A310 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
