Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

CPU

GPU

Arc A310

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Performance Spectrum

Arc A310

4 GB 75

5,438

0.0%

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

4 GB 170

5,474

+0.7%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A310

2022

Why buy it

✅4.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 169mm instead of 241mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 54.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
❌42.6% longer card at 241mm vs 169mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM instead at 5,474 vs 5,438, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A310 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A310

The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM reaches 5,474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 980 MHz.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
G3D Mark Score	5,438	5,474
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Kepler
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1344+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.072 TFLOPS+17%	2.634 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2000 MHz+104%	980 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	112+250%
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+900%	0.11 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — a 54.8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	124 GB/s	192 GB/s+55%
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM).

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	1st Gen NVENC
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM's 170W — a 77.6% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 169mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
TDP	75W-56%	170W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	2x 6-pin
Length	169mm	241mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	65°C-24%	85°C
Perf/Watt	72.5+125%	32.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A310 (2022 vs 2013).

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
MSRP	$100	—
Codename	DG2-128	GK104
Release	October 12 2022	September 27 2013
Ranking	#422	#417

Search Arc A310 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.