
Arc A310

Radeon 760M
Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A310
2022Why buy it
- ✅36.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Radeon 760M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 54.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 8 (Radeon 760M) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 5,449 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS+73% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2599 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+746% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and System on the Radeon 760M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: None vs None. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 169mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5 | 363.3+401% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 760M (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Codename | DG2-128 | Phoenix |
| Release | October 12 2022 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #422 | #421 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















