Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M
Arc A310
Popular choices:
Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A310
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 760M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A310.
| Insight | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 760M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A310 and Radeon 760M
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 8 (Radeon 760M) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 5,449 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS+73% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2599 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+746% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: None vs None. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 169mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5 | 363.3+401% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | DG2-128 | Phoenix |
| Release | October 12 2022 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #422 | #421 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A310 and Radeon 760M
