Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M

Intel

Arc A310

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz
Arc family
···
VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz

Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A310

2022

Why buy it

  • 36.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Radeon 760M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc A310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 54.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 760M instead at 5,449 vs 5,438, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 6nm, 8 vs 6 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A310 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Arc A310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 760M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A310

The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 8 (Radeon 760M) with 96 Tensor cores.

FeatureArc A310Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
5,438
5,449
Architecture
Generation 12.7
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
6 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.072 TFLOPS
5.323 TFLOPS+73%
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2599 MHz+30%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+746%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
6
8+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A310Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and System on the Radeon 760M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A310Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A310Radeon 760M
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

FeatureArc A310Radeon 760M
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCN 4.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
VCN 4.0
Codecs
AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: None vs None. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.

FeatureArc A310Radeon 760M
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
169mm
Height
69mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-19%
80°C
Perf/Watt
72.5
363.3+401%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 760M (2024 vs 2022).

FeatureArc A310Radeon 760M
MSRP
$100
Codename
DG2-128
Phoenix
Release
October 12 2022
January 31 2024
Ranking
#422
#421

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.