Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 670
Arc A310
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A310
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A310 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The Arc A310 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 670.
| Insight | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $100 for the Arc A310, it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 392.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+392.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A310 and GeForce GTX 670
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
GeForce GTX 670
The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the GeForce GTX 670 reaches 5,361 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 670 uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438+1% | 5,361 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1344+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS+17% | 2.634 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+104% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 112+250% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+900% | 0.11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 670) — a 54.8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 670. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 670) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 192 GB/s+55% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs NVENC (3rd Gen) (GeForce GTX 670). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (1st Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 670).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC (3rd Gen) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (1st Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 670's 170W — a 77.6% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 670). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 169mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 82 C.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-56% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 169mm | 241mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-21% | 82 C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5+130% | 31.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A310 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTX 670 launched at $399 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTX 670 costs 80% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 268.1 (GeForce GTX 670) — the GeForce GTX 670 offers 392.8% better value. The Arc A310 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-75% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $20-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4 | 268.1+393% |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GK104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | May 10 2012 |
| Ranking | #422 | #424 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A310 and GeForce GTX 670
