Arc A310 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Arc A310 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q Performance Spectrum

Arc A310

4 GB 75

5,438

+1.6%

5,353

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

Titan X Pascal

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A310 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A310 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A310

2022

Why buy it

✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 54.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (5,438 vs 5,353), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A310 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc A310 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A310

The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

Feature	Arc A310	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	5,438+2%	5,353
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Pascal
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	768
Boost Clock	2000 MHz+36%	1468 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A310	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 Max-Q.

Feature	Arc A310	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 6.5% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Arc A310	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
TDP	75W-6%	80W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	169mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	72.5+8%	66.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A310 (2022 vs 2017).

Feature	Arc A310	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
MSRP	$100	—
Codename	DG2-128	GP107GL
Release	October 12 2022	July 5 2017
Ranking	#422	#426

Search Arc A310 on Amazon

Search Quadro P2000 Max-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.