Arc A310 vs Radeon RX 7600
Arc A310
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A310
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 204.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A310.
| Insight | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-204.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+204.9%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 22% better value per dollar than the Arc A310.
| Insight | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A310 and Radeon RX 7600
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A310 scores 5,438 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 204.9%. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 16,581+205% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+608% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2655 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+120% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 32+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A310 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A310 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 132.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 288 GB/s+132% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 75% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 169mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-55% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 169mm | 240mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5 | 100.5+39% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A310 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Arc A310 costs 60% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 21.9% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-63% | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-60% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4 | 66.3+22% |
| Codename | DG2-128 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #422 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A310 and Radeon RX 7600
