Arc A310 vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A310 vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A310 vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A310

2022

Why buy it

✅11.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 196.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
200% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 54.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire instead at 5,500 vs 5,438, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 196.6% (54.4 vs 18.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc A310 vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A310

The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 900 MHz.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
G3D Mark Score	5,438	5,500+1%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2560+233%
Boost Clock	2000 MHz+122%	900 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — a 23.9% advantage for the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 256-bit x2 on the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	124 GB/s	153.6 GB/s x2+24%
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit x2+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
TDP	75W-63%	200W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	169mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	72.5+164%	27.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A310 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire launched at $300. On MSRP, Arc A310 was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 18.3 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — the Arc A310 offers 197.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc A310 (2022 vs 2012).

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
MSRP	$100-67%	$300
Performance per Dollar	54.4+197%	18.3
Codename	DG2-128	Neptune CF
Release	October 12 2022	May 1 2012
Ranking	#422	#350

Search Arc A310 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.