Arc A310 vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Arc A310
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A310
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A310 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The Arc A310 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A310.
| Insight | Arc A310 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $100 for the Arc A310, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 34.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc A310 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+34.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A310 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 5,500+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+122% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — a 23.9% advantage for the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s x2+24% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit x2+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 169mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5+164% | 27.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A310 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire launched at $300 and now averages $75. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire costs 25% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 73.3 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers 34.7% better value. The Arc A310 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | Arc A310 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-67% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $75-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4 | 73.3+35% |
| Codename | DG2-128 | Neptune CF |
| Release | October 12 2022 | May 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #422 | #350 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A310 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
