Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Arc A310
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A310
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 130.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A310.
| Insight | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-130.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+130.5%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 10.3% better value per dollar than the Arc A310.
| Insight | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A310 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A310 scores 5,438 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 130.5%. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) with 96 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438 | 12,535+131% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+196% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+13% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 2.5 MB+127% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 20+233% |
| Tensor Cores | 96+20% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A310 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 80.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 224 GB/s+81% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 169mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-42% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 169mm | 242mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-2% | 66°C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5 | 96.4+33% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A310 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The Arc A310 costs 52.2% less ($109 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 10.3% better value.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-60% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-52% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4 | 60.0+10% |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GA106 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #422 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A310 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
