
GeForce GTX 970M SLI

Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 970M SLI vs Quadro M3000M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 970M SLI vs Quadro M3000M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 970M SLI vs Quadro M3000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M3000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌116% higher power demand at 162W vs 75W.
Quadro M3000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅31.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 162W, a 87W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 970M SLI vs Quadro M3000M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 970M SLI
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 162W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Quadro M3000M
The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI scores 5,500 and the Quadro M3000M reaches 5,574 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is built on Maxwell while the Quadro M3000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 1 (Quadro M3000M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,574+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1,024 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M3000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 192-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 970M SLI and 128-bit on the Quadro M3000M.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit x2+50% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP6) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI draws 162W versus the Quadro M3000M's 75W — a 73.4% difference. The Quadro M3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro M3000M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M SLI | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 162W | 75W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0 | 74.3+119% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














