
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 980M: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 980M is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 980M: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 980M is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 980M better than GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) make more sense than GeForce GTX 980M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 15 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1380 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)'s 6,968 — the GeForce GTX 980M leads by 5.5%. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 3.195 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353+6% | 6,968 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 3.195 TFLOPS+93% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 1560 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 1 MB+79% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) — a 25% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 980M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s+25% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)'s 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5 | 139.4+90% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












