G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX250

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 10W instead of 70W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅312.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 301.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌600% higher power demand at 70W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 312.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 352.6% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 2,375), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 14nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $19 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 301.7% (63.6 vs 15.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX250

The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX250 scores 2,375 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 352.6%. The GeForce MX250 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX250) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	2,375	10,749+353%
Architecture	Pascal	Ampere
Process Node	14 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	384	2304+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS+750%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1470 MHz+42%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	72+200%
L1 Cache	0.14 MB	2.3 MB+1543%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX250 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX250 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 48 GB/s (GeForce MX250) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX250 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX250) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	6 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	48 GB/s	168 GB/s+250%
Bus Width	64-bit	96-bit+50%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce MX250) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	None	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX250 draws 10W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 150% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX250) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP	10W-86%	70W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Mobile	None
Length	0mm	160mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	237.5+55%	153.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX250 came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce MX250 was 11.2% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.8 (GeForce MX250) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 302.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP	$150-11%	$169
Performance per Dollar	15.8	63.6+303%
Codename	GP108B	GA107
Release	February 20 2019	February 2 2024
Ranking	#643	#252

Search GeForce MX250 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.