G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 3070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 3070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX250

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 10W instead of 220W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅756.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 180.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2100% higher power demand at 220W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 756.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 833.6% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 2,375), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 14nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $349 more expensive on MSRP at $499 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 180.6% (44.4 vs 15.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX250

The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX250 scores 2,375 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 833.6%. The GeForce MX250 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX250) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1725 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3070
G3D Mark Score	2,375	22,172+834%
Architecture	Pascal	Ampere
Process Node	14 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	384	5888+1433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	20.31 TFLOPS+2448%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1725 MHz+66%
ROPs	16	96+500%
TMUs	24	184+667%
L1 Cache	0.14 MB	5.8 MB+4043%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX250 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX250 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 48 GB/s (GeForce MX250) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 833.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX250 and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX250) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3070
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	8 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	48 GB/s	448 GB/s+833%
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3070
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce MX250) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3070
Encoder	None	NVENC 7th gen
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX250 draws 10W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 182.6% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX250) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3070
TDP	10W-95%	220W
Recommended PSU	350W-46%	650W
Power Connector	Mobile	8-pin
Length	0mm	242mm
Height	0mm	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	237.5+136%	100.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX250 came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce MX250 was 69.9% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.8 (GeForce MX250) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 181% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce MX250	GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP	$150-70%	$499
Performance per Dollar	15.8	44.4+181%
Codename	GP108B	GA104
Release	February 20 2019	September 1 2020
Ranking	#643	#63

Search GeForce MX250 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.