GeForce MX250
Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U
GeForce MX250 vs Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX250 vs Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX250 vs Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX250
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX250 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U
2017Why buy it
- ✅7.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 15W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX250 vs Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce MX250
The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.
Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U
The Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,330 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX250 scores 2,375 and the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U reaches 2,330 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX250 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U uses Vega, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX250) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250) vs 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,375+2% | 2,330 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Vega |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.843 TFLOPS+131% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1200 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX250 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX250 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U carries 0 MB. GeForce MX250 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX250 and System on the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce MX250) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U).
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX250 draws 10W versus the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U's 15W — a 40% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX250) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-33% | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 237.5+53% | 155.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX250 came in at $150, while the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.8 (GeForce MX250) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U) — the Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX250 (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108B | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | February 20 2019 | October 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #643 | #721 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega Ryzen 3 5300U
