CPU
GPU
GeForce PCX 5750
Popular choices:
GeForce 6150 LE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce PCX 5750 is positioned at rank 366 and the GeForce 6150 LE is on rank 688, so the GeForce PCX 5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6150 LE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 6150 LE is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The GeForce 6150 LE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce PCX 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce PCX 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6150 LE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6150 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 6150 LE holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 41.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+41.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce PCX 5750 and GeForce 6150 LE
GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.
GeForce 6150 LE
The GeForce 6150 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce PCX 5750 scores 35 versus the GeForce 6150 LE's 33 — the GeForce PCX 5750 leads by 6.1%. The GeForce PCX 5750 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce 6150 LE uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 384 (GeForce 6150 LE). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6150 LE).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35+6% | 33 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+76% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+150% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+567% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce PCX 5750 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6150 LE has 512 MB. The GeForce 6150 LE offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 512 KB (GeForce 6150 LE) — the GeForce PCX 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6150 LE). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 2.1+40% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce PCX 5750) vs None (GeForce 6150 LE). Decoder: None vs PureVideo (VP1). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 6150 LE).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | PureVideo (VP1) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5750 draws 219W versus the GeForce 6150 LE's 10W — a 182.5% difference. The GeForce 6150 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 350W (GeForce 6150 LE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 65.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 10W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 100mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 65-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 3.3+1550% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 6150 LE launched at $30 and now averages $10. The GeForce 6150 LE costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 3.3 (GeForce 6150 LE) — the GeForce 6150 LE offers 43.5% better value. The GeForce 6150 LE is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $30-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | 3.3+43% |
| Codename | GF110 | GP108 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #497 | #657 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce PCX 5750 and GeForce 6150 LE
