
GeForce PCX 5750
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5900ZT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce PCX 5750 is positioned at rank #366 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce PCX 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5900ZT.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce PCX 5750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce PCX 5750 and GeForce FX 5900ZT

GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce FX 5900ZT
The GeForce FX 5900ZT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce PCX 5750 scores 35 versus the GeForce FX 5900ZT's 33 — the GeForce PCX 5750 leads by 6.1%. The GeForce PCX 5750 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce FX 5900ZT uses Rankine, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900ZT). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900ZT).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35+6% | 33 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1024 ×2+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+13% | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 40 | 48 ×2+20% |
| TMUs | 60 | 64 ×2+7% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1 MB+6% |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB | 768 KB+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900ZT) — the GeForce FX 5900ZT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB | 768 KB+20% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900ZT). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0a |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 2.1+40% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce PCX 5750) vs None (GeForce FX 5900ZT). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5900ZT).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5750 draws 219W versus the GeForce FX 5900ZT's 365W — a 50% difference. The GeForce PCX 5750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5900ZT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 218mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W-40% | 365W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 218mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2+100% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce FX 5900ZT launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce FX 5900ZT costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5900ZT) — the GeForce FX 5900ZT offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5900ZT is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF110 | GF110 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | March 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #497 | #555 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















