
GeForce PCX 5900
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce PCX 5900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13.3% higher G3D Mark score and 296.8% more VRAM (256 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9550.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5900 | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+13.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-13.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+296.8%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce PCX 5900 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce PCX 5900 and MOBILITY RADEON 9550

GeForce PCX 5900
The GeForce PCX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $699.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce PCX 5900 scores 34 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 30 — the GeForce PCX 5900 leads by 13.3%. The GeForce PCX 5900 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5900 | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34+13% | 30 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 ×2+28% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2+11% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 ×2+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+1150% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5900 | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce PCX 5900 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 has 65 MB. The GeForce PCX 5900 offers 296.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) — the GeForce PCX 5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5900 | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+297% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5900 draws 365W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 50W — a 151.8% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5900 | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 365W | 50W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.6+500% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce PCX 5900 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 launched at $100 and now averages $10. The GeForce PCX 5900 costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 3.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) — the GeForce PCX 5900 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce PCX 5900 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5900 | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 3.0 |
| Codename | GF110 | Broadway |
| Release | March 24 2011 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #555 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















