GeForce PCX 5900
VS
Quadro FX 1100

GeForce PCX 5900 vs Quadro FX 1100

NVIDIA

GeForce PCX 5900

2011Core: 607 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1100

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5900.

InsightGeForce PCX 5900Quadro FX 1100
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%)
Leading raw performance (+5.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce PCX 5900 and Quadro FX 1100

NVIDIA

GeForce PCX 5900

The GeForce PCX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1100

The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce PCX 5900 scores 34 versus the Quadro FX 1100's 36 — the Quadro FX 1100 leads by 5.9%. The GeForce PCX 5900 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro FX 1100 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1100). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100).

FeatureGeForce PCX 5900Quadro FX 1100
G3D Mark Score
34
36+6%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1024 ×2+327%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS ×2+100%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
48 ×2+50%
32
TMUs
64 ×2
80+25%
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce PCX 5900Quadro FX 1100
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1100) — the GeForce PCX 5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce PCX 5900Quadro FX 1100
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce PCX 5900 draws 365W versus the Quadro FX 1100's 189W — a 63.5% difference. The Quadro FX 1100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce PCX 5900Quadro FX 1100
TDP
365W
189W-48%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
190mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.2+100%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce PCX 5900 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro FX 1100 launched at $0 and now averages $500. The GeForce PCX 5900 costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 1100) — the GeForce PCX 5900 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce PCX 5900 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce PCX 5900Quadro FX 1100
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$500
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.1
Codename
GF110
GT200B
Release
March 24 2011
November 11 2008
Ranking
#555
#815