GeForce 6200 vs GeForce PCX 5900

NVIDIA

GeForce 6200

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce PCX 5900

2011Core: 607 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce 6200 vs GeForce PCX 5900 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200 vs GeForce PCX 5900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200 vs GeForce PCX 5900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200

2019

Why buy it

  • +8.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce PCX 5900 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 6200 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 10W instead of 365W, a 355W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce PCX 5900

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (34 vs 37).
  • 2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • 3550% higher power demand at 365W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 6200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.8% in PassMark G3D (37 vs 34), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 6200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 6200 vs GeForce PCX 5900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 6200

The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce PCX 5900

The GeForce PCX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the GeForce PCX 5900's 34 — the GeForce 6200 leads by 8.8%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce PCX 5900 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 1,024 (GeForce PCX 5900). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce PCX 5900).

FeatureGeForce 6200GeForce PCX 5900
G3D Mark Score
37+9%
34
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1024 ×2+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7972 TFLOPS
1.244 TFLOPS ×2+56%
ROPs
16
48 ×2+200%
TMUs
24
64 ×2+167%
L1 Cache
0.14 MB
1 MB+614%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 6200GeForce PCX 5900
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 128-bit on the GeForce PCX 5900. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6200) vs 768 KB (GeForce PCX 5900) — the GeForce PCX 5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 6200GeForce PCX 5900
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the GeForce PCX 5900's 365W — a 189.3% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5900). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce 6200GeForce PCX 5900
TDP
10W-97%
365W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
100mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
3.7+3600%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the GeForce PCX 5900 launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce PCX 5900 was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs Infinity (GeForce PCX 5900) — the GeForce PCX 5900 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6200 (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 6200GeForce PCX 5900
MSRP
$129
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
Infinity
Codename
GP108B
GF110
Release
February 20 2019
March 24 2011
Ranking
#643
#555

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.