G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2060 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2060 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅+435.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,637 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 435.2% in PassMark G3D (14,114 vs 2,637), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and 30 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 2060 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 2060 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 2,637 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 435.2%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	14,114+435%	2,637
Architecture	Turing	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1920+400%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS+577%	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	120+88%	64
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+280%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)+9%	11.0
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	PureVideo HD
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
TDP	160W	100W-38%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	113mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	72-15%	85°C
Perf/Watt	88.2+234%	26.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
MSRP	$349	—
Codename	TU106	GF114
Release	January 7 2019	March 22 2012
Ranking	#168	#704

Search GeForce RTX 2060 on Amazon

Search MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.