
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro M5000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Quadro M5000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,056 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro M5000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅+100% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,056 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro M5000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M5000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro M5000M

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M
The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro M5000M's 7,056 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 100%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro M5000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 (Quadro M5000M). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1051 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+100% | 7,056 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+25% | 1,536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+115% | 2.995 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+60% | 1051 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120+25% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+239% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M5000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5000M has 8 GB. The Quadro M5000M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5000M) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro M5000M's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro M5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Quadro M5000M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 100W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+25% | 70.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | TU106 | GM204 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #168 | #353 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













