
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+102.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $76 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 146.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 229mm vs 201mm.
Quadro P2000
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 201mm instead of 229mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,964 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 5 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌21.8% HIGHER MSRP$425 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro P2000
2017Why buy it
- ✅+102.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $76 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 146.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 201mm instead of 229mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 229mm vs 201mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,964 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 5 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌21.8% HIGHER MSRP$425 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro P2000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro P2000

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro P2000's 6,964 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 102.7%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+103% | 6,964 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+88% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+113% | 3.031 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+14% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+20% | 40 |
| TMUs | 120+88% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+400% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+140% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 has 5 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+20% | 5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+140% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 201mm |
| Height | 113mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 92.9+5% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 17.9% less ($76 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 16.4 (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 146.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-18% | $425 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+146% | 16.4 |
| Codename | TU106 | GP106 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | February 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #168 | #346 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













