
GeForce RTX 2060

Quadro P4200
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro P4200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro P4200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro P4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅14.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $851 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 367.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
- ❌118.1% longer card at 229mm vs 105mm.
Quadro P4200
2018Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 229mm, a 124mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌243.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,200 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro P4200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro P4200
The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro P4200's 10,376 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 36%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro P4200 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1647 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+36% | 10,376 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2304+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 7.589 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+2% | 1647 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 144+20% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+126% | 0.84 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P4200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4200 carries 8 GB. Quadro P4200 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 256-bit on the Quadro P4200. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (Quadro P4200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro P4200's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Quadro P4200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 100W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 105mm |
| Height | 113mm | 82mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 103.8+18% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the Quadro P4200 launched at $1200. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2060 was 70.9% cheaper ($851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8.6 (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 369.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-71% | $1200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+370% | 8.6 |
| Codename | TU106 | GP104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #168 | #266 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















