
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅81.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $451 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 304.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro V520
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌129.2% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon Pro V520
2020Why buy it
- ✅81.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $451 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 304.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌129.2% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro V520?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro V520 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 90 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro V520

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520
The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro V520's 8,000 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 76.4%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro V520 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1600 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+76% | 8,000 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2304+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 7.373 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+5% | 1600 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 144+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V520 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V520 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) — the Radeon Pro V520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro V520's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V520). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+148% | 35.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro V520 launched at $800. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 56.4% less ($451 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 10.0 (Radeon Pro V520) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 304% better value. The Radeon Pro V520 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-56% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+304% | 10.0 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 12 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #168 | #218 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













