
GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon PRO V710
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon PRO V710 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon PRO V710 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon PRO V710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+17.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,651 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 574% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Radeon PRO V710 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌473.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon PRO V710 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon PRO V710's 12,000 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 17.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+18% | 12,000 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3456+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS+329% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2000 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 216+80% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+153% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 54+80% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO V710 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO V710 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 1.3% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 158W-1% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+16% | 75.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2060 was 82.5% cheaper ($1651 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 573.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO V710 (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-83% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+573% | 6.0 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 32 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | October 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #168 | #196 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















