
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+67.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 163.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,426 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌57.3% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅+67.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 163.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,426 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌57.3% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon R9 290X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 95 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R9 290X

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R9 290X's 8,426 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 67.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 947 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+68% | 8,426 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2816+47% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+15% | 5.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+77% | 947 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 176+47% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+175% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 290X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X) — a 5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+5% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 512-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 74.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-54% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 275mm |
| Height | 113mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-24% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+266% | 24.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 36.4% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 164.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-36% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+164% | 15.3 |
| Codename | TU106 | Hawaii |
| Release | January 7 2019 | October 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #168 | #342 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













